art by JeongSeok Lee
Apocalypse 2020
Since it is the end, I decided to check out some of the free speech platforms that I had walked away from because of the irrational bigotry pervading those forums. The experience was extremely generative for my rational ideas and allowed me to make better sense of my life and the Wuhan virus pandemic. The following is a recap of some of those developments.
Tobias R. Confession (Hanau Shooter)
My renewal of interest in "free speech" platforms was short-lived, but it began with the Tobias R. confession. The MSM was refusing to allow the public to hear Tobias R.'s confession in a short video he posted before his domestic terrorism rampage in Hanau. When the MSM did include the confession, they excerpted it to create a slanted bias. I was able to access the entire confession through alternative media sources and the confession was revealing. My primary comment was as follows:
"not sure why there are so many thumbs downs for this video. it's very informative. Note: he uses the term "to stone" enemies. Although, stoning has been a popular method of community retributive justice for millennia, today it is something almost exclusively practiced in Muslim societies (and state sanctioned, I might add). But, this recalls ISIL execution videos and how they utilize Hollywood style editing systems to showcase their atrocities. Would the truly devout use systems developed by their symbolic enemies? No. Would the truly devout, co-opt a practice (such as stoning) from their symbolic enemy? No. So, the upshot is that this doesn't signal a "false flag" (probably) but reveals that terrorist attacks (whatever the ideology) are not carried out by the devout but instead by the "infected" among the devout. Within a radical faction, the most radical who actually end up taking action are likely doing so because they no longer have self-control over their animosity toward their symbolic enemy, and they feel as if they are being "infected" by their enemy's ideologies. This pushes these individuals and groups toward taking violent action. This is just a hypothesis that I think deserves further investigation. Basically, what I'm presenting is that terrorist attackers should not be associated with the ideologies they profess to support, and in fact, their actions reflect some new kind of ideology to which all terrorist attackers belong."
I still agree with my hypothesis in the comment above: if we hope to discover individuals that have lost self-control we may be able to identify them through their online content reflecting the adoption of ideology from their professed symbolic enemies.
"not sure why there are so many thumbs downs for this video. it's very informative. Note: he uses the term "to stone" enemies. Although, stoning has been a popular method of community retributive justice for millennia, today it is something almost exclusively practiced in Muslim societies (and state sanctioned, I might add). But, this recalls ISIL execution videos and how they utilize Hollywood style editing systems to showcase their atrocities. Would the truly devout use systems developed by their symbolic enemies? No. Would the truly devout, co-opt a practice (such as stoning) from their symbolic enemy? No. So, the upshot is that this doesn't signal a "false flag" (probably) but reveals that terrorist attacks (whatever the ideology) are not carried out by the devout but instead by the "infected" among the devout. Within a radical faction, the most radical who actually end up taking action are likely doing so because they no longer have self-control over their animosity toward their symbolic enemy, and they feel as if they are being "infected" by their enemy's ideologies. This pushes these individuals and groups toward taking violent action. This is just a hypothesis that I think deserves further investigation. Basically, what I'm presenting is that terrorist attackers should not be associated with the ideologies they profess to support, and in fact, their actions reflect some new kind of ideology to which all terrorist attackers belong."
I still agree with my hypothesis in the comment above: if we hope to discover individuals that have lost self-control we may be able to identify them through their online content reflecting the adoption of ideology from their professed symbolic enemies.
New Tang Dynasty - China in Focus
Tobias R.'s confession video being censored by the MSM did not surprise me, but once I realized the MSM was intent on protecting the image of the CCP during the Wuhan virus pandemic, I turned to more independent and unbiased news reporting. I discovered NTD news and their China in Focus series on YouTube. The news was very informative including primary documents from the CCP being translated by the NTD journalists. NTD was founded by Falun Gong which led me to research the spiritual faith. I was pleased to discover that Falun Gong is a rational individualist movement in China (sorely needed for that culture) and they have been targeted, persecuted, abducted and tortured by the CCP. I took the opportunity on free speech platforms to inform the community about Falun Gong and NTD news. This was my comment in the post:
"Falun Gong is a late 20th century spiritual movement that originated with the Chinese. It is about individualism and totally against collectivism. As such, they speak out against the CCP. As a result, they are persecuted, sometimes leading to them being tortured and killed by the Chinese government.
New Tang Dynasty news agency is based in NYC, but reports and footage is often coming straight from China, including translations of government documents. NTD has landed in hot water several times for associating with "alt-right" news outlets. They claim to be politically neutral and unbiased... but perhaps we could say that they aspire to unbiased reporting. You may find their YT content useful. They also have official websites to check out.
To give you some indication of how dangerous the CCP finds NTD - when NTD reporters show up at events in the West, CCP bigwig cancel and lay pressure on Western companies and governments to stigmatize NTD and be uncooperative with them generally.
The way I see it is that China has always have a massive population and as a result has developed a sheeple, anti-exceptionalism approach to social order. As a result, the Chinese have an inherent weakness for embracing collectivism. What I have learned about Falun Gong suggests that there is nothing insidious or cult-like about the 'affiliation'. It is simply China's movement of individualism expressed through Eastern spiritual traditions.
I am a rational individualist and until I notice NTD doing something sketchy and cult-like then I will continue to support their work. Feel free to do your own research and if you find anything that is suspect, leave a comment."
NTD is still suffering MSM persecution.
"Falun Gong is a late 20th century spiritual movement that originated with the Chinese. It is about individualism and totally against collectivism. As such, they speak out against the CCP. As a result, they are persecuted, sometimes leading to them being tortured and killed by the Chinese government.
New Tang Dynasty news agency is based in NYC, but reports and footage is often coming straight from China, including translations of government documents. NTD has landed in hot water several times for associating with "alt-right" news outlets. They claim to be politically neutral and unbiased... but perhaps we could say that they aspire to unbiased reporting. You may find their YT content useful. They also have official websites to check out.
To give you some indication of how dangerous the CCP finds NTD - when NTD reporters show up at events in the West, CCP bigwig cancel and lay pressure on Western companies and governments to stigmatize NTD and be uncooperative with them generally.
The way I see it is that China has always have a massive population and as a result has developed a sheeple, anti-exceptionalism approach to social order. As a result, the Chinese have an inherent weakness for embracing collectivism. What I have learned about Falun Gong suggests that there is nothing insidious or cult-like about the 'affiliation'. It is simply China's movement of individualism expressed through Eastern spiritual traditions.
I am a rational individualist and until I notice NTD doing something sketchy and cult-like then I will continue to support their work. Feel free to do your own research and if you find anything that is suspect, leave a comment."
NTD is still suffering MSM persecution.
|
|
|
Ok, Moony
People seemed to be confused when Joe Biden stormed back on Super Tuesday given all the Bernie hype leading up. You have to realize that "ok, boomer" defiance is simply the punk movement for the Z-gen kids. It wouldn't be punk and anti-establishment to actually vote, but it is punk to put on airs of pledging allegiance to the guy that Boomers are fundamentally against - the anti-establishment candidate... the communist, Bernie Sanders.
Bernie is a communist and not an anarchist (the latter is what teenage angst will always vibe with). Young voter support for Bernie is a fickle thing and young people's interest in claiming support for communism (a system guaranteed to block young people from having any new technology in their multimedia home setup) will die when that old fart passes on - ok, boomer?
So, let's not make a big deal out of young people supporting Bernie... it's a hollow pledge done for the sake of being a little punk kid. Big deal... my generation's RATM and Nirvana devotion made our parents uneasy and confused as well. The generation older than me had The Misfits or The Six Pistols (misspelled purposefully) and before that it was Beatlemania or Elvis hip thrusts. Later, we grow up and can see Cobain and de la Rocha for what they were - angry, broken men yelling at the walls. There's better things you can do with your life and many people realize that once they get past their focus on generational divides.
Bernie is a communist and not an anarchist (the latter is what teenage angst will always vibe with). Young voter support for Bernie is a fickle thing and young people's interest in claiming support for communism (a system guaranteed to block young people from having any new technology in their multimedia home setup) will die when that old fart passes on - ok, boomer?
So, let's not make a big deal out of young people supporting Bernie... it's a hollow pledge done for the sake of being a little punk kid. Big deal... my generation's RATM and Nirvana devotion made our parents uneasy and confused as well. The generation older than me had The Misfits or The Six Pistols (misspelled purposefully) and before that it was Beatlemania or Elvis hip thrusts. Later, we grow up and can see Cobain and de la Rocha for what they were - angry, broken men yelling at the walls. There's better things you can do with your life and many people realize that once they get past their focus on generational divides.
1984 from 2020
With so much disinformation coming out of China from the CCP, it was unclear how global alliances were shaping up. Strange events were occurring, such as the attempted royal coup in Saudi Arabia. I decided to do a thought experiment about the Wuhan virus being a bioweapon used to give "Eastern Powers" an opportunity to grasp hegemonic control over global politics and the world economy. Here is the comment on the thought experiment:
"Here is a chess puzzle...
Imagine the current Russia vs Saudi Arabia oil war is a ruse. What if, the "Eastern powers" for the first time ever see a real opportunity to topple the West. I am imagining a situation where the failed coup in Saudi Arabia was to remove royals that are actually loyal to the West. This means the Crown Prince is not actually loyal to the West and is primarily motivated by the goal of destroying Israel. I am imagining that Iran was targeted with Covid-19 (by Russia) so that it would spark a coup there leading to new rulers in the theocracy that support the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia. North Korea is an annoying puppet of China. China is aligned with Russia. Russia is motivated to destroy Israel not primarily because of anti-semitism, but because it would give them an opportunity to become the most powerful nation in the world.
How it plays out is that a nuke is dropped on NYC. Russia, Iran and Saudi Arabia immediately invade Israel and commit genocide. The world still isn't 100% sure about who launched the nuke as it originated near Pakistan. The confusion freezes the West from taking swift action and the invasion of Israel looks like it might be unrelated and simply an exploitation of a golden opportunity for nations that hate Israel (Russia, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Iran, primarily). USA conclude the Eastern powers launched the nuke but are told to mind their business or get nuked again. USA considers nuking back but realizes it would only result in the destruction of the planet. USA and the West are assured that the Eastern powers only want to destroy Israel and otherwise they are willing to negotiate new terms for their diplomatic and economic relationships globally. China uses North Korea to keep Japan in line while things are sorted out. The West is basically held hostage by tyrannical madmen who are willing to take the gamble that the West is bluffing when threatening nuclear retaliation. And the madmen are correct.
So, by the end of it all Israel has been eradicated, but USA is no longer the top power. The Americans embrace their isolationist roots and set themselves to the task of stopping a second civil war. UK rejoins the EU, and Europe commits to isolationism as well. The West expels migrants and illegals, and they are sent home. Most are never heard from again. USA sorts out their internal strife and then focuses on a relationship with Guyana for their crude oil supply which leads to a Union of the Americas. Europe plods forward but slowly finds themselves stagnating in a dark ages period known as the Grey Ages. Prosperous Russia lends some support under unique terms that sees the proliferation of Russian culture throughout Europe. It is known as the "Subtle Revolution". The Middle East and Asia forge new relationships and establish late capitalist feudalism based around multinational conglomeration and non-existent antitrust law. Automation everywhere leads to mass starvation and tribal warfare in Africa. Eventually, a bioweapon virus is unleashed on Africa to eradicate its population. The Russian-Europe superpower continent and the MiddleEast-Asian superpower continent carve up Africa and develop it as a vacation getaway spot for their elites as well as gulag for their dissidents.
The world never becomes an NWO empire, but instead is three "super-continents" - just like Orwell predicted in his novel, 1984. The super-continents rely on propaganda and fear to keep their citizens under control. People don't work because of automation and most citizens are lulled to death through inane interactive augmented reality social media trashperience. "Woke" individuals are eradicated on all super-continents.
If this can't happen... explain why
If you believe this could happen or are at least if you are willing to entertain the scenario... then do you think it is overall a good thing? And which continent would you want to live in?... and what happens next?"
One member of the free speech community did comment the post and claimed the scenario that I outlined would never happen because "Sand niggers cant fight and Putin not looking for a war with USA! USA!". This comment spurred me to research the power of the US military as compared with the Eastern powers. It would seem that the US's military might is twice that of all of the rest of the world together. Therefore, there is something to be said for the crude comment.
"Here is a chess puzzle...
Imagine the current Russia vs Saudi Arabia oil war is a ruse. What if, the "Eastern powers" for the first time ever see a real opportunity to topple the West. I am imagining a situation where the failed coup in Saudi Arabia was to remove royals that are actually loyal to the West. This means the Crown Prince is not actually loyal to the West and is primarily motivated by the goal of destroying Israel. I am imagining that Iran was targeted with Covid-19 (by Russia) so that it would spark a coup there leading to new rulers in the theocracy that support the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia. North Korea is an annoying puppet of China. China is aligned with Russia. Russia is motivated to destroy Israel not primarily because of anti-semitism, but because it would give them an opportunity to become the most powerful nation in the world.
How it plays out is that a nuke is dropped on NYC. Russia, Iran and Saudi Arabia immediately invade Israel and commit genocide. The world still isn't 100% sure about who launched the nuke as it originated near Pakistan. The confusion freezes the West from taking swift action and the invasion of Israel looks like it might be unrelated and simply an exploitation of a golden opportunity for nations that hate Israel (Russia, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Iran, primarily). USA conclude the Eastern powers launched the nuke but are told to mind their business or get nuked again. USA considers nuking back but realizes it would only result in the destruction of the planet. USA and the West are assured that the Eastern powers only want to destroy Israel and otherwise they are willing to negotiate new terms for their diplomatic and economic relationships globally. China uses North Korea to keep Japan in line while things are sorted out. The West is basically held hostage by tyrannical madmen who are willing to take the gamble that the West is bluffing when threatening nuclear retaliation. And the madmen are correct.
So, by the end of it all Israel has been eradicated, but USA is no longer the top power. The Americans embrace their isolationist roots and set themselves to the task of stopping a second civil war. UK rejoins the EU, and Europe commits to isolationism as well. The West expels migrants and illegals, and they are sent home. Most are never heard from again. USA sorts out their internal strife and then focuses on a relationship with Guyana for their crude oil supply which leads to a Union of the Americas. Europe plods forward but slowly finds themselves stagnating in a dark ages period known as the Grey Ages. Prosperous Russia lends some support under unique terms that sees the proliferation of Russian culture throughout Europe. It is known as the "Subtle Revolution". The Middle East and Asia forge new relationships and establish late capitalist feudalism based around multinational conglomeration and non-existent antitrust law. Automation everywhere leads to mass starvation and tribal warfare in Africa. Eventually, a bioweapon virus is unleashed on Africa to eradicate its population. The Russian-Europe superpower continent and the MiddleEast-Asian superpower continent carve up Africa and develop it as a vacation getaway spot for their elites as well as gulag for their dissidents.
The world never becomes an NWO empire, but instead is three "super-continents" - just like Orwell predicted in his novel, 1984. The super-continents rely on propaganda and fear to keep their citizens under control. People don't work because of automation and most citizens are lulled to death through inane interactive augmented reality social media trashperience. "Woke" individuals are eradicated on all super-continents.
If this can't happen... explain why
If you believe this could happen or are at least if you are willing to entertain the scenario... then do you think it is overall a good thing? And which continent would you want to live in?... and what happens next?"
One member of the free speech community did comment the post and claimed the scenario that I outlined would never happen because "Sand niggers cant fight and Putin not looking for a war with USA! USA!". This comment spurred me to research the power of the US military as compared with the Eastern powers. It would seem that the US's military might is twice that of all of the rest of the world together. Therefore, there is something to be said for the crude comment.
R.I.P. King Osric
I am a rational individualist and not a bigot, therefore, I have never done very well on free speech platforms and most of my posts are ignored or downvoted. I have been accused of being a Jewish shill, a libtard, and an FBI spy. However, I have done well on free speech platforms with TIL (today-I-learned) education and non-political content. Max von Sydow was a great actor who has performed countless classic roles. When he passed away in March, I decided to post a four-minute tribute video from Oliver Stone's Conan the Barbarian. The King Osric role was definitive for portraying the enlightened barbarian king.
Weird Misprint - Should Say 2025!
Perhaps, the best way to embrace the apocalypse is with a good sense of humour. I posted one of the best scenes from Mike Judge's Idiocracy to remind people of where we are heading and how quickly we are getting there.
Toilet Paper by any other name would wipe as smooth...
One of the MSM distractions of the Wuhan virus pandemic has been the toilet paper hoarding. Fortunately, this issue resulted in the media noting other more insidious forms of consumer exploitation. I posted a link to a Canadian news article about a B.C. couple that had bought up $100k worth of essential product with the intention to gouge citizens in need. They shamelessly justified the move by claiming that their children go to an expensive private school and they won't be getting their tuition refunded for the cancelled school term. Although, I find this behaviour deplorable, one user at the free speech platform commented, "Capitalism for the WIN!". I didn't sense duplicity in the comment and believe that the comment came from a radical libertarian (known to frequent free speech platforms). This sociopathic libertarian truly believes that if someone has the means and nerve to destroy thousands of lives then they should be allowed to in the name of capitalist free markets. Strong disagree.
The Search for TP continues...
The toilet paper hoarding issue was a ludicrous and obvious as a MSM distraction that I decided to post a clip from Bernard Rose's Candyman and suggest that it reflected an apocalyptic futurescape where toilet paper is the final commodity of any worth. The post wasn't well received because racists on free speech platforms will zealously downvote or ignore any media that doesn't denigrate non-whites. That being said, if you are one of the most popular users then you may get away with linking music videos from non-white musicians. Hatred on free speech platforms is a fickle and finicky thing.
|
|
Worldometer Hack
I had been paying attention to Worldometer Wuhan virus numbers from the first day the statistic aggregator website began tracking the pandemic. On March 16, Worldometer was hacked leading to wonky numbers that were focused on a passive-aggressive threat against the Pope. The hack only lasted twenty minutes but I was on the site when it happened and got a couple of screencaps. After a month of reading Qanonsense (Qanon conspiracy) at free speech social media platforms, something real had finally happened. I was so disgusted that the community ignored my post (actually, it was likely shadowbanned) that I made my next post an attack on the major cult communities on free speech platforms.
There are several factions at free speech platforms that are difficult to deal with. You have to be willing to give as good as you get if you plan to survive interacting with these communities. Also, you have to know when to back down because some of these factions have the skill, knowledge and means to make your life difficult either through doxxing or hacking. For me, each faction has some value and some of their beliefs are legitimate. That being said, they are dogmatic ideologues. When the Worldometer post was ignored in favour of more Qanonsense, I decided to take a jab at QAnon. QAnon is mainly composed of evangelical Christians and neo-fascist radical isolationist American nationalists. Their speech is not "free" and is instead compelled speech based on their affiliations. That would define them as "NPCs" in the broader sense of the pop culture stigma. I created an NPC Jesus Christ side-by-side with an NPC Joseph Goebbels. It didn't go over well by those who viewed it although one person upvoted the post and someone commented that I shouldn't take the ignorance of the users so seriously.
Free speech platform factions are mainly: radical isolationists (neo-Nazis), radical libertarians, evangelical Christians, nihilistic sociopaths, and devoted trolls. All have dangerous elements and all have reasonable individuals that are capable of open and polite discourse.
Free speech platform factions are mainly: radical isolationists (neo-Nazis), radical libertarians, evangelical Christians, nihilistic sociopaths, and devoted trolls. All have dangerous elements and all have reasonable individuals that are capable of open and polite discourse.
Dr. Soros or: How i learned to stop worrying and love the libra
I developed an understanding of power on Earth. The post read as follows:
"This is a summary of my conspiracy theory for events that are relevant at the moment:
It isn't NWO, Illuminati, Bilderberg Group or Radical Zionism that matters. The world has a secret war, between the Old Money Order and the New Money Order - in effect, gold vs silicon.
Old Money Order (OMO) has its backbone in banking, but also gained its power through manufacturing-based industries. OMO, more or less, goes back to the Industrial Revolution. Bilderberg meetings were for the most part OMO chiefs discussing what would be appropriate initiatives to ensure they maintain their power. These meetings were arranged in anticipation that new industries would eventually create a New Money Order (NMO).
In effect, OMO has been terrified for decades about NMO taking over. However, OMO had the control of banking and the gold reserves needed to maintain a gold standard for currencies. OMO has globalist agendas, but chiefs in OMO are also fairly independent. Many OMO powerhouses flip flop and sometimes show allegiance to NMO, and vice-versa.
New Money Order is based in Silicon Valley, through the shift to service industry and its reliance on software solutions and computer technology. Mark Zuckerberg is now a big player in the NMO. Facebook Libra was set to launch around May 2020.
It is unclear if COVID-19 was released as a bioweapon or if, like many viruses, it emerged through filthy cultural-based activities (ie. wet markets) for a world that has too many people and can no longer set moral standards for itself (if it ever could). Regardless, the spread of COVID-19 has been exacerbated by the bearish bailout of stock markets. Was the bailout an OMO initiative or a NMO initiative?
Consider what was about to happen - Zuckerberg's Facebook Libra was about to become the equivalent of a Paypal and Visa/Debit service combined. It was to be marketed to the young generations (what I call X-Y blender, Gen-Y, and Y-Z blender). If this had happened, then OMO has no base of power because Libra as a "silicon-based" currency becomes the new standard and replaces gold - it's what people are trading. Traditional banking is destroyed.
Therefore, it is possible that NMO is fueling the economic crash because it creates a sense of distrust for young people about the gold standard-based economy and the traditional banks. When things bounce back, young generations will not trust investing with banks and they will invest what money they have with Libra.
Alternatively, fueling the economic crash may have been OMO who saw no other choice but to delay the roll-out of Libra. If you were to follow me so far and buy into this conspiracy, then you can imagine the bottom line for OMO is to have the disease ravage the world, especially the developed and wealthy nations in hopes that the elderly die and therefore their wealth and assets are handed down to the children as inheritance.
Why does this matter? The older generations (I dub, Diffident Gen, War Babies, and Baby Boomers) can often make it to a century old and their investment practices from retirement onward do not create much economic stimulation (it is safe investments, usually in retirement funds and property). Meanwhile, their children's generations could start making exciting and risky investment moves in business if only they were capitalized. Kill off the oldies, get the money to their kids and then use the banking system's established infrastructure to lure the young generations that now have the wealth to be invested through the banks.
Where do guys like Bill Gates fit in? Was he NMO but who schmoozes with OMO and satisfies them through pushing globalist agendas in his philanthropic work? Perhaps.
Where does Jeff Bezos fit in? He may be an exotic who although being the richest, isn't actually privy to what chiefs discuss about the big OMO or NMO plans. He isn't trusted to know. It's possible.
Major and minor players may be switching sides often. It looks like recently OMO bought a stake in Twitter, but left NMO management in charge. What's up with that?
It is the human game of chess and even the players are not in the God position and they know it. The powerful pieces move around the board but there are still obstacles, and certain gambits that worked in the past fail later on. Selfishness remains the bottom line and allegiances are a fickle thing.
As for QAnon. My conspiracy theory on that is the following:
Tom Anderson who founded MySpace is also the person who created 4chan and its network of troll sites. By now, likely no one at the top of that network of sites realizes it was him (assuming anyone else involved ever did). He set it up as a giant honeypot for trolls and dissidents. The intention was not to hand over his data to DARPA and the CIA, but instead to protect his Hollywood buddies. He has Hollywood and elite buddies who have shady deviant lifestyles, yet he knows that these are not lifestyles involved in cult activity. At the same time, he knows that there is Hollywood and elite cult activity. He doesn't want his Hollywood and elite buddies implicated falsely as cult members and so he directs conspiracies such as Pizzagate and Q (he is Q) in order to direct people to a mixture of actual cult members and also just randoms that will end up false positives later. He knows who the weirdos are because he is the world's greatest hacker. He is such a legendary hacker that we didn't even realize it. We knew names like Kevin Mitnick, but forgot about Tom Anderson (despite his weirdo buddies, The Wachowskis, revealing who Tom truly is in both their Matrix trilogy and V for Vendetta).
Tom started 4chan, he started Anonymous as a political hacker movement, and he is Q.
He is happy to eventually see some cult elites exposed (they aren't anywhere as numerous as conspiracists believe), but his primary motivation remains to have conspiracy circles online as honeypots. Tom realized after the success of 4chan that there were too many different types of dissidents and he would never want to expose many of those people who really didn't deserve to be censored or harmed by state appratuses. 4chan showed him that an army of online trolls and hackers has more than just white, grey, and black hats... it also has silly and stupid kids that will grow out of trolling, it has rational individualists that are genuinely seeking the truth rather than trying to be agents of provocation, and it has those who may have once been radical and militant but later mellowed out and contributed something more valuable to the hacker and troll culture.
He created Q to further filter within the giant honeypot. Q has caused some significant separation. Q is so radical that it has a religious zealotry (supported through its evangelical Christian supporters). The cause is just (to expose pedophiles and end child abuse), but there are some dangerous characters that could grab the reins of such a movement and deform its original purpose. Tom will likely expose a cult of personality leader in the Q movement if they become dangerous to people's lives.
Tom's project got away from him. He's been playing the God role in the human game of chess, but he now realizes that he was trying to control the action on the board through using only pawns to create feints and fronts.
I'm not worried about Tom. He has a lot of power that no one realizes. I'm more worried about OMO vs NMO. Consider, that it was announced recently that Facebook Libra may have competition - Celo Alliance. Celo professes to follow Charles Eisenstein's ethos on digital based sharing culture. Eisenstein is known for backing Occupy Wallstreet. Many believe that George Soros was fiddling and farting around with Occupy Wallstreet in his role as an OMO goon and enforcer. This means that OMO is attempting to take over the NMO through pioneering similar technologies, while NMO is seeking to make OMO redundant. There is a "storm" brewing.
It may end in global warfare between USA and China. This has potential positive ramifications because it is more than likely that a war between USA and China will lead to Russia shifting over and becoming one of the Western powers (they were Allied powers in both World Wars)."
"This is a summary of my conspiracy theory for events that are relevant at the moment:
It isn't NWO, Illuminati, Bilderberg Group or Radical Zionism that matters. The world has a secret war, between the Old Money Order and the New Money Order - in effect, gold vs silicon.
Old Money Order (OMO) has its backbone in banking, but also gained its power through manufacturing-based industries. OMO, more or less, goes back to the Industrial Revolution. Bilderberg meetings were for the most part OMO chiefs discussing what would be appropriate initiatives to ensure they maintain their power. These meetings were arranged in anticipation that new industries would eventually create a New Money Order (NMO).
In effect, OMO has been terrified for decades about NMO taking over. However, OMO had the control of banking and the gold reserves needed to maintain a gold standard for currencies. OMO has globalist agendas, but chiefs in OMO are also fairly independent. Many OMO powerhouses flip flop and sometimes show allegiance to NMO, and vice-versa.
New Money Order is based in Silicon Valley, through the shift to service industry and its reliance on software solutions and computer technology. Mark Zuckerberg is now a big player in the NMO. Facebook Libra was set to launch around May 2020.
It is unclear if COVID-19 was released as a bioweapon or if, like many viruses, it emerged through filthy cultural-based activities (ie. wet markets) for a world that has too many people and can no longer set moral standards for itself (if it ever could). Regardless, the spread of COVID-19 has been exacerbated by the bearish bailout of stock markets. Was the bailout an OMO initiative or a NMO initiative?
Consider what was about to happen - Zuckerberg's Facebook Libra was about to become the equivalent of a Paypal and Visa/Debit service combined. It was to be marketed to the young generations (what I call X-Y blender, Gen-Y, and Y-Z blender). If this had happened, then OMO has no base of power because Libra as a "silicon-based" currency becomes the new standard and replaces gold - it's what people are trading. Traditional banking is destroyed.
Therefore, it is possible that NMO is fueling the economic crash because it creates a sense of distrust for young people about the gold standard-based economy and the traditional banks. When things bounce back, young generations will not trust investing with banks and they will invest what money they have with Libra.
Alternatively, fueling the economic crash may have been OMO who saw no other choice but to delay the roll-out of Libra. If you were to follow me so far and buy into this conspiracy, then you can imagine the bottom line for OMO is to have the disease ravage the world, especially the developed and wealthy nations in hopes that the elderly die and therefore their wealth and assets are handed down to the children as inheritance.
Why does this matter? The older generations (I dub, Diffident Gen, War Babies, and Baby Boomers) can often make it to a century old and their investment practices from retirement onward do not create much economic stimulation (it is safe investments, usually in retirement funds and property). Meanwhile, their children's generations could start making exciting and risky investment moves in business if only they were capitalized. Kill off the oldies, get the money to their kids and then use the banking system's established infrastructure to lure the young generations that now have the wealth to be invested through the banks.
Where do guys like Bill Gates fit in? Was he NMO but who schmoozes with OMO and satisfies them through pushing globalist agendas in his philanthropic work? Perhaps.
Where does Jeff Bezos fit in? He may be an exotic who although being the richest, isn't actually privy to what chiefs discuss about the big OMO or NMO plans. He isn't trusted to know. It's possible.
Major and minor players may be switching sides often. It looks like recently OMO bought a stake in Twitter, but left NMO management in charge. What's up with that?
It is the human game of chess and even the players are not in the God position and they know it. The powerful pieces move around the board but there are still obstacles, and certain gambits that worked in the past fail later on. Selfishness remains the bottom line and allegiances are a fickle thing.
As for QAnon. My conspiracy theory on that is the following:
Tom Anderson who founded MySpace is also the person who created 4chan and its network of troll sites. By now, likely no one at the top of that network of sites realizes it was him (assuming anyone else involved ever did). He set it up as a giant honeypot for trolls and dissidents. The intention was not to hand over his data to DARPA and the CIA, but instead to protect his Hollywood buddies. He has Hollywood and elite buddies who have shady deviant lifestyles, yet he knows that these are not lifestyles involved in cult activity. At the same time, he knows that there is Hollywood and elite cult activity. He doesn't want his Hollywood and elite buddies implicated falsely as cult members and so he directs conspiracies such as Pizzagate and Q (he is Q) in order to direct people to a mixture of actual cult members and also just randoms that will end up false positives later. He knows who the weirdos are because he is the world's greatest hacker. He is such a legendary hacker that we didn't even realize it. We knew names like Kevin Mitnick, but forgot about Tom Anderson (despite his weirdo buddies, The Wachowskis, revealing who Tom truly is in both their Matrix trilogy and V for Vendetta).
Tom started 4chan, he started Anonymous as a political hacker movement, and he is Q.
He is happy to eventually see some cult elites exposed (they aren't anywhere as numerous as conspiracists believe), but his primary motivation remains to have conspiracy circles online as honeypots. Tom realized after the success of 4chan that there were too many different types of dissidents and he would never want to expose many of those people who really didn't deserve to be censored or harmed by state appratuses. 4chan showed him that an army of online trolls and hackers has more than just white, grey, and black hats... it also has silly and stupid kids that will grow out of trolling, it has rational individualists that are genuinely seeking the truth rather than trying to be agents of provocation, and it has those who may have once been radical and militant but later mellowed out and contributed something more valuable to the hacker and troll culture.
He created Q to further filter within the giant honeypot. Q has caused some significant separation. Q is so radical that it has a religious zealotry (supported through its evangelical Christian supporters). The cause is just (to expose pedophiles and end child abuse), but there are some dangerous characters that could grab the reins of such a movement and deform its original purpose. Tom will likely expose a cult of personality leader in the Q movement if they become dangerous to people's lives.
Tom's project got away from him. He's been playing the God role in the human game of chess, but he now realizes that he was trying to control the action on the board through using only pawns to create feints and fronts.
I'm not worried about Tom. He has a lot of power that no one realizes. I'm more worried about OMO vs NMO. Consider, that it was announced recently that Facebook Libra may have competition - Celo Alliance. Celo professes to follow Charles Eisenstein's ethos on digital based sharing culture. Eisenstein is known for backing Occupy Wallstreet. Many believe that George Soros was fiddling and farting around with Occupy Wallstreet in his role as an OMO goon and enforcer. This means that OMO is attempting to take over the NMO through pioneering similar technologies, while NMO is seeking to make OMO redundant. There is a "storm" brewing.
It may end in global warfare between USA and China. This has potential positive ramifications because it is more than likely that a war between USA and China will lead to Russia shifting over and becoming one of the Western powers (they were Allied powers in both World Wars)."
I added a comment to my post:
"How much do I believe in this conspiracy theory? Not at all. I have my own belief system that is deeply embedded in a fantasy story that sees most humans as totally unimportant. My good vs evil paradigm is of cosmic proportions. I wrote a 400-page book last May, but have been waiting to do a final edit before shopping it to literary agents. My belief system is much truer to that story than what I have presented in this post. I'm not sure how my book will change but I needed to step back so that I could do a full edit with greater objectivity.
I suspect that what I have written here is false, and frankly it doesn't matter to me one way or the other. I think of myself as a creative mind and avid storyteller. I just want to entertain. Also, I think it would be very interesting to have conspiracy expert goats punch holes in my conspiracy theory here. I'm absolutely sure it can be done, because I am a total dilettante and tourist in this world. Still, I thought it would be fun to present my conspiracy theory because of the conspicuous silence over Facebook Libra.
I don't expect a warm reception for this post - any criticism of Q seems to be akin to shitting on a church altar. I guess that is the one thing in my conspiracy theory that I do believe - Q is dangerously close to becoming a cult and one with a congregation easily led to their slaughter by a false idol cult of personality leader. The "WWG1WGA" has become so hackneyed as to be trite, and that is when a movement loses its essence and the false hope can start to be controlled by a single voice that has only malevolent and wicked intent. That being said, if Q gets the job done (getting rid of Polanski-esque cults) then the world has benefited so all's well that ends well.
Troubling times to be sure."
"How much do I believe in this conspiracy theory? Not at all. I have my own belief system that is deeply embedded in a fantasy story that sees most humans as totally unimportant. My good vs evil paradigm is of cosmic proportions. I wrote a 400-page book last May, but have been waiting to do a final edit before shopping it to literary agents. My belief system is much truer to that story than what I have presented in this post. I'm not sure how my book will change but I needed to step back so that I could do a full edit with greater objectivity.
I suspect that what I have written here is false, and frankly it doesn't matter to me one way or the other. I think of myself as a creative mind and avid storyteller. I just want to entertain. Also, I think it would be very interesting to have conspiracy expert goats punch holes in my conspiracy theory here. I'm absolutely sure it can be done, because I am a total dilettante and tourist in this world. Still, I thought it would be fun to present my conspiracy theory because of the conspicuous silence over Facebook Libra.
I don't expect a warm reception for this post - any criticism of Q seems to be akin to shitting on a church altar. I guess that is the one thing in my conspiracy theory that I do believe - Q is dangerously close to becoming a cult and one with a congregation easily led to their slaughter by a false idol cult of personality leader. The "WWG1WGA" has become so hackneyed as to be trite, and that is when a movement loses its essence and the false hope can start to be controlled by a single voice that has only malevolent and wicked intent. That being said, if Q gets the job done (getting rid of Polanski-esque cults) then the world has benefited so all's well that ends well.
Troubling times to be sure."
This post, was ignored because it fit the description of "TL;DR". It is no wonder that this is the end, given the embrace of illiteracy in the West.
coronavirus art by Fubango
I followed up my conspiracy theory post with a philosophical take on the possible positive outcomes from the Wuhan virus pandemic.
"All of us (even the trannys) have testosterone and estrogen.
Normal men have more testosterone than estrogen
Normal men have more testosterone than women do
Normal women have more estrogen than testosterone
Norma women have more estrogen than men do
Testosterone regulates the affective-based "feeling" of aggression
Estrogen regulates the affective-based "feeling" of emotion
Feeling (aggression and emotion) is a lower faculty of experiencing
Thinking (introspection and ethics) is a higher faculty of experiencing
Aggression can be productive or destructive
Emotion can be productive or destructive
Those that express themselves through destructive aggression can be referred to as "Aggro Retards" or "Aggrotards"
Those that express themselves through destructive emotion can be referred to as "Emo Retards" or "Emotards"
Members of activist groups such as, Code Pink or Antifa, are both Aggrotarded and Emotarded
The feminist (or matriarchal) tenet that men are aggressive, and aggression is harmful leads to the syllogistic fallacy that "men are harmful" (misandry)
The patriarchal tenet that women are emotional, and emotion is irrational leads to the syllogistic fallacy that "women are irrational" (misogyny)
Feminists believe that emotion = good, while aggression = bad. This is wholly false and it is unproductive aggression (aggrotardation) in feminism that promotes these false ideas in the matriarchal ideology.
In shifting to the Service Industry, the Western World empowered women. Service work is the first form of dominant industrial labour that has not been based in physical abilities (hunter/gatherer, agriculture, manufacturing, machine industry, and the war machine all privilege physical abilities). Through service industry, women finally had the opportunity to gain economic power because services are primarily based in psychological work, and not physical work
Men are more susceptible to aggrotardation
Women are more susceptible to emotardation
Women becoming more powerful in the West in the postwar period has resulted in emotardation policies and cultural values. The weak are to be carried through at all costs by the strong. The weak are to survive despite it going against nature. This is what feminism and the matriarchy values and privileges.
Well, Wuhan Virus has the opportunity to cull the weak now. Western feminism has raised generations of petulant youth, selfish losers, and collectivist morons - extreme aggrotards and emotards. Just as we see the religious groups not practicing social distancing, we see the weak-willed Westerners doing the same. They will get infected and among them there will be deaths.
Meanwhile, critical thinkers will wisely stay at home mostly, get only essential sunlight and fresh air while crossing the street to avoid human contact. They will breath through their noses and hold their breath as they pass those who seem to be idiotic or sick. They will do this for a few months because it's not a big deal. Is it a big deal to move your arms and legs in deep water? If you think so then stop moving and see what happens. Real big deal stuff is being critical thinkers and spending all day thinking about important ideas - that's a big deal. We are used to our life having big deals going on (the ideas we work through daily), so self-isolation is a 'walk in the park' for us.
The virus is producing an opportunity to naturally winnow the weak and without feminists having the chance to squander it with their rallying cries for mercy driven by their emotardation (and aggrotardation).
I can do 6 months of self-isolation if that's what it takes for all the weak to ignore the wise interim lifestyle choices and get themselves killed off."
"All of us (even the trannys) have testosterone and estrogen.
Normal men have more testosterone than estrogen
Normal men have more testosterone than women do
Normal women have more estrogen than testosterone
Norma women have more estrogen than men do
Testosterone regulates the affective-based "feeling" of aggression
Estrogen regulates the affective-based "feeling" of emotion
Feeling (aggression and emotion) is a lower faculty of experiencing
Thinking (introspection and ethics) is a higher faculty of experiencing
Aggression can be productive or destructive
Emotion can be productive or destructive
Those that express themselves through destructive aggression can be referred to as "Aggro Retards" or "Aggrotards"
Those that express themselves through destructive emotion can be referred to as "Emo Retards" or "Emotards"
Members of activist groups such as, Code Pink or Antifa, are both Aggrotarded and Emotarded
The feminist (or matriarchal) tenet that men are aggressive, and aggression is harmful leads to the syllogistic fallacy that "men are harmful" (misandry)
The patriarchal tenet that women are emotional, and emotion is irrational leads to the syllogistic fallacy that "women are irrational" (misogyny)
Feminists believe that emotion = good, while aggression = bad. This is wholly false and it is unproductive aggression (aggrotardation) in feminism that promotes these false ideas in the matriarchal ideology.
In shifting to the Service Industry, the Western World empowered women. Service work is the first form of dominant industrial labour that has not been based in physical abilities (hunter/gatherer, agriculture, manufacturing, machine industry, and the war machine all privilege physical abilities). Through service industry, women finally had the opportunity to gain economic power because services are primarily based in psychological work, and not physical work
Men are more susceptible to aggrotardation
Women are more susceptible to emotardation
Women becoming more powerful in the West in the postwar period has resulted in emotardation policies and cultural values. The weak are to be carried through at all costs by the strong. The weak are to survive despite it going against nature. This is what feminism and the matriarchy values and privileges.
Well, Wuhan Virus has the opportunity to cull the weak now. Western feminism has raised generations of petulant youth, selfish losers, and collectivist morons - extreme aggrotards and emotards. Just as we see the religious groups not practicing social distancing, we see the weak-willed Westerners doing the same. They will get infected and among them there will be deaths.
Meanwhile, critical thinkers will wisely stay at home mostly, get only essential sunlight and fresh air while crossing the street to avoid human contact. They will breath through their noses and hold their breath as they pass those who seem to be idiotic or sick. They will do this for a few months because it's not a big deal. Is it a big deal to move your arms and legs in deep water? If you think so then stop moving and see what happens. Real big deal stuff is being critical thinkers and spending all day thinking about important ideas - that's a big deal. We are used to our life having big deals going on (the ideas we work through daily), so self-isolation is a 'walk in the park' for us.
The virus is producing an opportunity to naturally winnow the weak and without feminists having the chance to squander it with their rallying cries for mercy driven by their emotardation (and aggrotardation).
I can do 6 months of self-isolation if that's what it takes for all the weak to ignore the wise interim lifestyle choices and get themselves killed off."
One user commented that the post was too long and that I should have created a meme. I was livid with this shameless ignorance and commented:
"Memes are how new age retards communicate. Hackneyed quips are unknowledge"
It is worth noting that I use language online at free speech platforms that I wouldn't use in other situations. If you want to influence people to understand the issues, you have to use their idiom otherwise they discount you as a relevant personality at their forum.
"Memes are how new age retards communicate. Hackneyed quips are unknowledge"
It is worth noting that I use language online at free speech platforms that I wouldn't use in other situations. If you want to influence people to understand the issues, you have to use their idiom otherwise they discount you as a relevant personality at their forum.
"Don't Fear"
The QAnon conspiracy cult are a collective of evangelical Christian schizophrenics prone to cognitive dissociation through their liberal decoding of cryptic messages the members of the cult receive at 4chan from a sociopathic nihilist hacker who calls themselves "Q". One of the cryptic messages ("drops" and "comms") expressed that followers must "not fear". QAnons continued to post this message in hashtags for several weeks. As such, I decided to check whether QAnon cult members would respond positively to a post titled with the "don't fear" message. It is entirely likely that I have been shadowbanned on free speech platforms for most of the time I have been using them and therefore the results of my experiment do not mean much. However, the post was ignored. It included a video clip from Don Coscarelli's Phatasm where the scene carries a powerful message about how not fearing is essential for conquering threats. It is difficult to know whether QAnon is so hermetically-sealed that the members are programmed not to look at messages outside of their established network of people, or whether it is the case I am shadowbanned, but it was interesting that no one was interested in the post.
Rattling Cages
I had been noticing that there was an active war of words on free speech platforms between the QAnons, and then the deep state conspiracists & radical libertarians who believe that Q is a "psyop" or "LARP" and that QAnon members are poseurs. I created a post to innocuously draw out comments against Q. It worked! The post read:
"I'm trying to put together a list of the moments that are the most embarrassing in human history. Here is the primary criteria:
1) a huge number of people saw it
2) it will be remembered
3) one, or just a few people are responsible for the moment (so no military blunders, for example)
so far, I only have:
1) Serena Williams hissy fit (or chimpout if you prefer) at the US Open Finals
2) Tom Cruise jumping on Oprah's couch
i'm not counting wacko janet jackson nipple slip because it was obvious staged faggotry
not counting rumours either, such as richard gere's gerbil or kelsey grammar wearing his old lady's thong
appreciate any reminders because searching online doesn't help where almost all results are just dumb nipple slips or split pants of people we have never heard of
i'm sure biden has something brewing and he might end up on this list soon"
The post had language couched in the far-right idiom which encouraged the community to respond. Because the post was asking for assistance or help, it was essential to use the idiom as much as possible to avoid being considered a "beta cuck" or "jew shill". That being said, I don't mind discussing issues using crude language and I do believe in free speech (although I have my unique definition for what constitutes free speech).
Some commented with humiliating moments they could remember, and then I was fortunate to draw out some Q criticism. One user provided an image for a Q prediction that Hilary Clinton would be extradited on a particular day, years ago. Of course, this never happened. The user was alluding to the QAnon belief in Q drops as being a humiliating moment. Another user added to the first comment with, "lol Qew proved itself wrong only days after the psyop started."
The first user commented, "The first Q post is absolute proof that Q is a LARP. Q had not yet been established by any means so it can't be claimed "disinformation was necessary" since no one, including the Deep State, would know who the fuck this "Q" was anyway. He also could not have been communicating in code since no code for comms had been established yet. The fact that Q has never addressed the failure of the first few posts also backs up the LARP proof. All the Qtards simply overlook this and keep trusting the plan without any skepticism. That is truly saddening that so many ignorant people have trusted in something that will never happen." The second user replied, "And the similarities between Q LARP and Christianity just continue piling up.."
"I'm trying to put together a list of the moments that are the most embarrassing in human history. Here is the primary criteria:
1) a huge number of people saw it
2) it will be remembered
3) one, or just a few people are responsible for the moment (so no military blunders, for example)
so far, I only have:
1) Serena Williams hissy fit (or chimpout if you prefer) at the US Open Finals
2) Tom Cruise jumping on Oprah's couch
i'm not counting wacko janet jackson nipple slip because it was obvious staged faggotry
not counting rumours either, such as richard gere's gerbil or kelsey grammar wearing his old lady's thong
appreciate any reminders because searching online doesn't help where almost all results are just dumb nipple slips or split pants of people we have never heard of
i'm sure biden has something brewing and he might end up on this list soon"
The post had language couched in the far-right idiom which encouraged the community to respond. Because the post was asking for assistance or help, it was essential to use the idiom as much as possible to avoid being considered a "beta cuck" or "jew shill". That being said, I don't mind discussing issues using crude language and I do believe in free speech (although I have my unique definition for what constitutes free speech).
Some commented with humiliating moments they could remember, and then I was fortunate to draw out some Q criticism. One user provided an image for a Q prediction that Hilary Clinton would be extradited on a particular day, years ago. Of course, this never happened. The user was alluding to the QAnon belief in Q drops as being a humiliating moment. Another user added to the first comment with, "lol Qew proved itself wrong only days after the psyop started."
The first user commented, "The first Q post is absolute proof that Q is a LARP. Q had not yet been established by any means so it can't be claimed "disinformation was necessary" since no one, including the Deep State, would know who the fuck this "Q" was anyway. He also could not have been communicating in code since no code for comms had been established yet. The fact that Q has never addressed the failure of the first few posts also backs up the LARP proof. All the Qtards simply overlook this and keep trusting the plan without any skepticism. That is truly saddening that so many ignorant people have trusted in something that will never happen." The second user replied, "And the similarities between Q LARP and Christianity just continue piling up.."
Fingerpoke of Doom
I changed the pace of my posts and decided to use some older pop culture references, with a devout Christian as the focus - Terry Bollea aka Hulk Hogan. The community ignored the two posts (or didn't find them) but I did play out my 'what if' scenario for professional wrestling.
"I'm researching pro wrestling again. Tracking developments in the nWo. Just finished watching the early 1999 episode of Monday Nitro with the notorious Fingerpoke of Doom match between Hogan and Nash.
Supposedly, injuries plagued the success of the reunion. Who is to say whether that is kayfabe or not, but the reunion was such a great moment because the schism that created the Wolfpac never made any damn sense to me. Face turn for nWo was antithetical to the nature of that stable.
With the reunion (if everyone had been healthy), the nWo could have had a second wind and focused on tag team partnerships and a theme of brotherhood. Nash and Hall, Steiner and Luger, Norton and Bagwell, Hogan and Horace. It could be that it is always a surprise for opponents who would never know until the last minute who they would draw from the nWo (or have it like The Running Man where fans can sometimes vote). Hogan could groom Horace and fulfill a lot of fan's childhood hopes about having a close relationship with Hogan in that mentoring way.
Based on my setup here... how it then plays out in 1999 would be that the first course of action is jumping and ejecting Bret Hart from the group. Hart had it coming as he was always on the fringes and not a 'brother til the end' kind of guy in the nWo. Hennig can voluntarily leave and offer to join Hart in a tag team. That tag team would be ominous for all the nWo brotherhoods, but they could also add Neidhart and British Bulldog and claim an usurper 4 Horsemen status. At that point Flair would be active in recruiting new Horsemen to put down the Hart-led upstarts and 'imposters'.
Sting goes back to his brooding Eric Draven style and relentlessly picks on Luger. This leads to a feud with Steiner.
Disciple fails Hogan as security, and Horace's first big test is to take out Disciple and kayfabe cripple him. Stevie Ray is scared and gets called back to Harlem Heat (happened anyway)
Brian Adams, Konnan, and Giant one-by-one are rejected and beat down.
Bischoff goes back to announcing and is the heel announcer
Elizabeth cozies up with Luger (makes sense)
Less work on the mic and more group beat-downs along with actual finished wrestling matches. The group is now known as nWo Brotherhood. If it's singles wrestling, then the tag partner becomes the valet/manager in the match
That could have easily worked for all of 1999. Hogan might have handed off to Horace so that the New Blood angle never involved humiliating Hogan. Horace is too lightweight to carry the heavies in the nWo Brotherhood and the stable collapses allowing those guys to retire in peace. The New Blood angle always left a bad taste in my mouth, and it made WCW fans seem like a petulant bunch of little bastards. It wasn't difficult for McMahon to tank the ailing promotion after that.
Of course, injuries were claimed as key here, so it's all just a big what-if."
I added to the post with a comment:
"addendum:
Hitman's 4 Horsemen imposters would be Hart, Hennig, Bulldog and Neidhart
Neidhart and Bulldog dismissed and replaced with Benoit and Sid (they betray Flair who thinks they will join his new Horsemen)
Flair builds new Horsemen stable with Jericho as leader (Flair is manager)
Hugh Morrus, Bryan Clark and Rick Steiner are added"
The first post was in the largest pro wrestling subverse and to date was only viewed by ten users, none of which commented or gave a rating. There are just over 100 subs in that subverse. The Hogan/McMahon interview video (the second post) was posted to the largest subverse on the platform (100k subs). It was downvoted overall and had two comments, including one NPC that blamed tabloid terrorism on Israel. To date, the second post was viewed by under 30 people. The average views for top posts on the site in the last 30 days was around 1000. Sometimes there were more than 500 upvotes for posts with less than 1000 views. A few posts had over 5000 views, but the views for those posts seem to be deriving from being indexed in search engines, meaning the views are likely coming from google bots and other search engine bots.
"I'm researching pro wrestling again. Tracking developments in the nWo. Just finished watching the early 1999 episode of Monday Nitro with the notorious Fingerpoke of Doom match between Hogan and Nash.
Supposedly, injuries plagued the success of the reunion. Who is to say whether that is kayfabe or not, but the reunion was such a great moment because the schism that created the Wolfpac never made any damn sense to me. Face turn for nWo was antithetical to the nature of that stable.
With the reunion (if everyone had been healthy), the nWo could have had a second wind and focused on tag team partnerships and a theme of brotherhood. Nash and Hall, Steiner and Luger, Norton and Bagwell, Hogan and Horace. It could be that it is always a surprise for opponents who would never know until the last minute who they would draw from the nWo (or have it like The Running Man where fans can sometimes vote). Hogan could groom Horace and fulfill a lot of fan's childhood hopes about having a close relationship with Hogan in that mentoring way.
Based on my setup here... how it then plays out in 1999 would be that the first course of action is jumping and ejecting Bret Hart from the group. Hart had it coming as he was always on the fringes and not a 'brother til the end' kind of guy in the nWo. Hennig can voluntarily leave and offer to join Hart in a tag team. That tag team would be ominous for all the nWo brotherhoods, but they could also add Neidhart and British Bulldog and claim an usurper 4 Horsemen status. At that point Flair would be active in recruiting new Horsemen to put down the Hart-led upstarts and 'imposters'.
Sting goes back to his brooding Eric Draven style and relentlessly picks on Luger. This leads to a feud with Steiner.
Disciple fails Hogan as security, and Horace's first big test is to take out Disciple and kayfabe cripple him. Stevie Ray is scared and gets called back to Harlem Heat (happened anyway)
Brian Adams, Konnan, and Giant one-by-one are rejected and beat down.
Bischoff goes back to announcing and is the heel announcer
Elizabeth cozies up with Luger (makes sense)
Less work on the mic and more group beat-downs along with actual finished wrestling matches. The group is now known as nWo Brotherhood. If it's singles wrestling, then the tag partner becomes the valet/manager in the match
That could have easily worked for all of 1999. Hogan might have handed off to Horace so that the New Blood angle never involved humiliating Hogan. Horace is too lightweight to carry the heavies in the nWo Brotherhood and the stable collapses allowing those guys to retire in peace. The New Blood angle always left a bad taste in my mouth, and it made WCW fans seem like a petulant bunch of little bastards. It wasn't difficult for McMahon to tank the ailing promotion after that.
Of course, injuries were claimed as key here, so it's all just a big what-if."
I added to the post with a comment:
"addendum:
Hitman's 4 Horsemen imposters would be Hart, Hennig, Bulldog and Neidhart
Neidhart and Bulldog dismissed and replaced with Benoit and Sid (they betray Flair who thinks they will join his new Horsemen)
Flair builds new Horsemen stable with Jericho as leader (Flair is manager)
Hugh Morrus, Bryan Clark and Rick Steiner are added"
The first post was in the largest pro wrestling subverse and to date was only viewed by ten users, none of which commented or gave a rating. There are just over 100 subs in that subverse. The Hogan/McMahon interview video (the second post) was posted to the largest subverse on the platform (100k subs). It was downvoted overall and had two comments, including one NPC that blamed tabloid terrorism on Israel. To date, the second post was viewed by under 30 people. The average views for top posts on the site in the last 30 days was around 1000. Sometimes there were more than 500 upvotes for posts with less than 1000 views. A few posts had over 5000 views, but the views for those posts seem to be deriving from being indexed in search engines, meaning the views are likely coming from google bots and other search engine bots.
Dreadful DREADDs
I decided to put together details for a fabricated conspiracy of my own devising. I was going to present it to QAnon followers to see if they would bite on the bait, or alternatively react to the fact that the conspiracy theory was intended as a wind-up to mock them. The problem is that once investigating the details and putting the pieces together, I uncovered developments in neuroscience technology that constitute a legitimate conspiracy theory. Here are details of the post:
"I'm not one for fandangled conspiracies and I originally intended to create this post as a tongue-in-cheek mockery of #ObeyQ type zealotry.
There's a serious problem now - as I gathered the pieces for creating a fake conspiracy theory to mock Qtards, I ended up discovering some truly horrifying facts based in scientific journals.
One the one hand, we have a neuroscience technique being pioneered that could be very helpful.
On the other hand, we have a neuroscience technique being pioneered that could be used for mass brainwashing and mind control (no this isn't science fiction).
Here are some links for now:
https://biomedicalodyssey.blogs.hopkinsmedicine.org/2017/10/a-revelation-about-dreadds-a-new-neuroscience-technique-with-promise-for-clinical-psychiatric-treatment/
https://www.genengnews.com/magazine/325/this-is-your-brain-on-dreadds/
https://www.the-scientist.com/daily-news/chemogenetics-doesnt-work-like-many-thought-31127
Now, please correct me if I'm wrong here... these articles published a few years ago seem to be suggesting that a virus injected into our body (in the articles it mentions the brain specifically) would deliver the DREADDS. DREADDS (synthetic brain receptors) are then controlled from the outside of our bodies by light signals (as one option, and possibly other options such as sound signals). DREADDS when activated release clozapine. Clozapine is a very powerful antipsychotic used to treat schizophrenia (where all other antipsychotic options have failed).
So, what it sounds like is this:
Utopian framework of analysis: Schizophrenics or others suffering neurological conditions may be susceptible to homicidal or suicidal behaviour. Sometimes, it is difficult to keep these people on their meds. This puts them and us at danger. Clozapine is an effective antipsychotic but requires constant monitoring and bloodwork. Ideally, you could find a way to release clozapine to the brain only when you need to (to control a schizo that's off the rails). With DREADDS, you have that ability to control the release of the clozapine through non-invasive means (light signals, etc.) and once the DREADDS are in the brain you don't have to keep relying on medication. This solution is the safest for the patient and the community. The DREADDS end up in the brain through injecting a virus into the brain (ok, so Wuhan virus isn't being injected into our brains, but this research is now several years old and we can assume more pioneering of techniques has taken place since)
Dystopian framework of analysis: they found a way to get DREADDS in our brains through Wuhan virus. Alternatively, since vaccines typically have a weak strain of a virus you are looking to be immunized against, then it is the Wuhan virus vaccine that will have the DREADDS. The DREADDS in our brains can be activated through signals (light, perhaps sound, maybe perhaps something related to 5G). When activated, these synthetic brain receptors release clozapine which is a powerful antipsychotic. Antipsychotics are more-or-less powerful sedatives that operate like straight-jackets for the mind. In other words, a light signal could cause a mass population to experience being sedated mentally thus potentially making people easier to control.
Now, the dystopian framework of analysis sounds absolutely terrifying and recalls John Carpenter's They Live, among other horror stories. However, these articles really do seem to be suggesting that the research was heading in this direction. I hate the Q conspiracies and it seems so bunk to me. I hate the 5G conspiracies I have heard as well. But, these articles really have me grey pilling hard. Is it benevolent scientific innovation or has the research been hijacked by a malevolent agency? Is it both? Could there be a perverse benevolence, such as the DREADDS are intended to only be used to control schizos that are refusing to be diagnosed and treated? (some of you guys will need to watch out!)
The Western world has become a house divided as it were and social media has allowed the crazies on the left and right to have too much influence. Is this DREADD antipsychotic delivery system designed to address that problem and silence the nutters?
I would like to white pill on this one, but the black pill is oozing and throbbing like some kind of malignant parasite. It would be easy to believe that DREADDS will live up to their name. It's possible it could be a global solution to a real problem (noisy nutjobs).
What's your money on? And if a vaccine is the DREADD delivery system, then what would you do if the state demanded your compliance with being vaccinated?
Additionally, COVID-19 could be a staging procedure for a more effective DREADD delivery system a few years from now. Meaning, we didn't have to vaccinate this time and our reaction was overkill, but the next one will have us begging for a vaccine because we understand the anxiety that accompanies living with an "invisible enemy".
It's pretty scary if you extrapolate imaginatively... what makes it scariest is you don't need to extrapolate all that much. The information is right there in black and white. Are you "waving the red flag"?
I lightly hate and mainly pity a lot of people here, but I didn't give up on the community. I started to believe in the MO "the more you tolerate, the more you can tolerate". What I truly hate is left-wing simpering safe-space ideology. I have learned to tolerate the intolerable here and now I finally have something important to contribute in this post.
more to note... it looks like a lot of the research into DREADDs is about helping people break addictions, such as alcoholism (see Joel L. Gomez's work on DREADD)
also, it seems that once the injected virus delivers the DREADDs to your brain then you need CNO to activate the DREADDs and CNO can be administered through water supply (that's the Chemogenetics aspect whereas the light signals is for a similar process in Optogenetics which went out of favour supposedly because using light signals wasn't very effective)"
I followed up with another post linking are article about remote brain control:
https://aeon.co/ideas/remote-control-of-the-mind-is-coming-how-will-we-use-it
I had brought the "Qtards" some real facts and information that could easily be tied to government "deep state" corruption, but the post was ignored and even downvoted overall. Qtards had proven that they were only interested in claiming that Hilary Clinton was a pedophile because she had a photo on her Instagram where she is eating a slice of pizza, or conclude that the Treasury had secretly purchased the Federal Reserve because a junior analyst at Bloomberg published an opinion piece that suggested such a thing was possible. The Qtards simply pursue "leads" related to Q "drop" and "comms" provided to them on the world's most notorious troll website. It's an embarrassing experience to use "free speech" platforms.
"I'm not one for fandangled conspiracies and I originally intended to create this post as a tongue-in-cheek mockery of #ObeyQ type zealotry.
There's a serious problem now - as I gathered the pieces for creating a fake conspiracy theory to mock Qtards, I ended up discovering some truly horrifying facts based in scientific journals.
One the one hand, we have a neuroscience technique being pioneered that could be very helpful.
On the other hand, we have a neuroscience technique being pioneered that could be used for mass brainwashing and mind control (no this isn't science fiction).
Here are some links for now:
https://biomedicalodyssey.blogs.hopkinsmedicine.org/2017/10/a-revelation-about-dreadds-a-new-neuroscience-technique-with-promise-for-clinical-psychiatric-treatment/
https://www.genengnews.com/magazine/325/this-is-your-brain-on-dreadds/
https://www.the-scientist.com/daily-news/chemogenetics-doesnt-work-like-many-thought-31127
Now, please correct me if I'm wrong here... these articles published a few years ago seem to be suggesting that a virus injected into our body (in the articles it mentions the brain specifically) would deliver the DREADDS. DREADDS (synthetic brain receptors) are then controlled from the outside of our bodies by light signals (as one option, and possibly other options such as sound signals). DREADDS when activated release clozapine. Clozapine is a very powerful antipsychotic used to treat schizophrenia (where all other antipsychotic options have failed).
So, what it sounds like is this:
Utopian framework of analysis: Schizophrenics or others suffering neurological conditions may be susceptible to homicidal or suicidal behaviour. Sometimes, it is difficult to keep these people on their meds. This puts them and us at danger. Clozapine is an effective antipsychotic but requires constant monitoring and bloodwork. Ideally, you could find a way to release clozapine to the brain only when you need to (to control a schizo that's off the rails). With DREADDS, you have that ability to control the release of the clozapine through non-invasive means (light signals, etc.) and once the DREADDS are in the brain you don't have to keep relying on medication. This solution is the safest for the patient and the community. The DREADDS end up in the brain through injecting a virus into the brain (ok, so Wuhan virus isn't being injected into our brains, but this research is now several years old and we can assume more pioneering of techniques has taken place since)
Dystopian framework of analysis: they found a way to get DREADDS in our brains through Wuhan virus. Alternatively, since vaccines typically have a weak strain of a virus you are looking to be immunized against, then it is the Wuhan virus vaccine that will have the DREADDS. The DREADDS in our brains can be activated through signals (light, perhaps sound, maybe perhaps something related to 5G). When activated, these synthetic brain receptors release clozapine which is a powerful antipsychotic. Antipsychotics are more-or-less powerful sedatives that operate like straight-jackets for the mind. In other words, a light signal could cause a mass population to experience being sedated mentally thus potentially making people easier to control.
Now, the dystopian framework of analysis sounds absolutely terrifying and recalls John Carpenter's They Live, among other horror stories. However, these articles really do seem to be suggesting that the research was heading in this direction. I hate the Q conspiracies and it seems so bunk to me. I hate the 5G conspiracies I have heard as well. But, these articles really have me grey pilling hard. Is it benevolent scientific innovation or has the research been hijacked by a malevolent agency? Is it both? Could there be a perverse benevolence, such as the DREADDS are intended to only be used to control schizos that are refusing to be diagnosed and treated? (some of you guys will need to watch out!)
The Western world has become a house divided as it were and social media has allowed the crazies on the left and right to have too much influence. Is this DREADD antipsychotic delivery system designed to address that problem and silence the nutters?
I would like to white pill on this one, but the black pill is oozing and throbbing like some kind of malignant parasite. It would be easy to believe that DREADDS will live up to their name. It's possible it could be a global solution to a real problem (noisy nutjobs).
What's your money on? And if a vaccine is the DREADD delivery system, then what would you do if the state demanded your compliance with being vaccinated?
Additionally, COVID-19 could be a staging procedure for a more effective DREADD delivery system a few years from now. Meaning, we didn't have to vaccinate this time and our reaction was overkill, but the next one will have us begging for a vaccine because we understand the anxiety that accompanies living with an "invisible enemy".
It's pretty scary if you extrapolate imaginatively... what makes it scariest is you don't need to extrapolate all that much. The information is right there in black and white. Are you "waving the red flag"?
I lightly hate and mainly pity a lot of people here, but I didn't give up on the community. I started to believe in the MO "the more you tolerate, the more you can tolerate". What I truly hate is left-wing simpering safe-space ideology. I have learned to tolerate the intolerable here and now I finally have something important to contribute in this post.
more to note... it looks like a lot of the research into DREADDs is about helping people break addictions, such as alcoholism (see Joel L. Gomez's work on DREADD)
also, it seems that once the injected virus delivers the DREADDs to your brain then you need CNO to activate the DREADDs and CNO can be administered through water supply (that's the Chemogenetics aspect whereas the light signals is for a similar process in Optogenetics which went out of favour supposedly because using light signals wasn't very effective)"
I followed up with another post linking are article about remote brain control:
https://aeon.co/ideas/remote-control-of-the-mind-is-coming-how-will-we-use-it
I had brought the "Qtards" some real facts and information that could easily be tied to government "deep state" corruption, but the post was ignored and even downvoted overall. Qtards had proven that they were only interested in claiming that Hilary Clinton was a pedophile because she had a photo on her Instagram where she is eating a slice of pizza, or conclude that the Treasury had secretly purchased the Federal Reserve because a junior analyst at Bloomberg published an opinion piece that suggested such a thing was possible. The Qtards simply pursue "leads" related to Q "drop" and "comms" provided to them on the world's most notorious troll website. It's an embarrassing experience to use "free speech" platforms.
Manifest Qtardation
I am very much in favour of justice for children that have suffered abuse. However, I believe that the schizophrenia in pizzagate conspiracist and "Qultist" circles is making it easier for pedophiles to get away with their crimes. It is possible that these cults have been created by pedophiles that are hoping to protect themselves by having schizo zealots accusing everyone of being a child abuser based on inscrutable cues. Once scarlet letters are flying around willy-nilly, it becomes impossible for authorities to justify investigating people that have been accused - it is simply unreasonable because of the proven unreliability of the accusers. I believe that Qultists need psychiatric care and I hope that they get it sooner than later.
In the meantime, due to my frustration with how Qultists have taken over free speech platforms, I decided to create a few memes to mock them. The first post played on a very popular meme with Steven Crowder at his "Change my Mind" table. 5 people saw the post and no one rated or commented the post. This tells me one of two things: 1) I am shadowbanned and very few users are able to see my posts (this happens to me at all sites virtually), 2) Qultists are virtually the only active users on free speech platforms these days and they will not view content from unapproved content creators. Actually, I believe that it is a bit of both.
The first post was titled: "Don't call Q a bumquack, it's been here for years, spookin their peers, putting their children in fear"
In the meantime, due to my frustration with how Qultists have taken over free speech platforms, I decided to create a few memes to mock them. The first post played on a very popular meme with Steven Crowder at his "Change my Mind" table. 5 people saw the post and no one rated or commented the post. This tells me one of two things: 1) I am shadowbanned and very few users are able to see my posts (this happens to me at all sites virtually), 2) Qultists are virtually the only active users on free speech platforms these days and they will not view content from unapproved content creators. Actually, I believe that it is a bit of both.
The first post was titled: "Don't call Q a bumquack, it's been here for years, spookin their peers, putting their children in fear"
The second meme post mocking Q was titled "Q Identity Revealed". A recent hot topic in QAnon conspiracy circles has been the discovery of Q's identity. The hack shill, Alex Jones, has made a statement about knowing the identity of Q and revealing it "or else". I have made my own statement that Q is Tom Anderson. In the meme, I use the meme convention of red circle identifiers. Qultists are compared with idiotic slave monkeys while Q is the malevolent Mr. Burns and QAnon's cherished, Donald J. Trump is the iconic buffoon, Homer Simpson.
The meme did receive some views, however the statistics are suspect. The post had 18 ratings, but only 14 views. Try explaining that Justin Chastain. I have concluded that all social media platforms are rigged and all statistics are damn lies. I have concluded that my presumptions of being shadowbanned were never cases of paranoia or arrogance. This is a truly rotten world.
The meme did receive some views, however the statistics are suspect. The post had 18 ratings, but only 14 views. Try explaining that Justin Chastain. I have concluded that all social media platforms are rigged and all statistics are damn lies. I have concluded that my presumptions of being shadowbanned were never cases of paranoia or arrogance. This is a truly rotten world.
1 Billion Infected
I decided to post what I consider to be a fair conclusion about the Wuhan virus pandemic and the Western reaction to it. The post was downvoted at free speech platforms and banned at Reddit. There is no place in this world to be a rational individualist and when all the rational individualists end up committing suicide, I hope that future humans living centuries from now look back and study our work and make a vow to never allow individualism to be persecuted ever again.
"when you consider that likely 100M-1B people have contracted Wuhan virus since October 2019, then we can see that this pandemic isn't deadly enough for the reaction we have taken. When we lacked information in February, the spread demanded a serious multilateral response. Great! - we did the right thing at the time and we can now see it was overkill. People are so frightened right now that when they have mild symptoms or are basically asymptomatic, they don't come forward for testing fearing oppressive living conditions beyond the current state of oppression if they were to test positive. Therefore, we might conjecture that there are probably 1 billion people that have been infected. It has killed under 50k when you consider the nerfing of pneumonia and flu death numbers in the last three months. The reaction is overkill and is currently maintained to protect large corporate entities from legal liability - they can't afford all the lawyers required to stop workers and customers from suing them for catching the bug while in the stores, but if they shut down and mom-and-pop shops stay open then later when order is restored, they have lost a considerable amount of business. FDR never putting teeth back into antitrust law resulted in a laissez-faire capitalism that has given rise to multinational conglomerate feudal states and these feudal states run the world and dictate to our politicians what should be the governing logic for policy making. The saddest part of all this, is that "power" players can't do anything without the masses either supporting the action or just letting it happen without resistance... meaning, we have done all of this to ourselves. Citizens have become pussy faggots, especially in the West - a place where the most powerful citizen revolutions occurred for centuries. The West is the new 3rd World - 3rd rate political mentality, 3rd rate political enfranchisement, 3rd rate political consciousness. Voat is one of the last refuges for those who still want to think dangerously ie. think about freedom. That makes goats the real refugees of this world. There is no 'pill' to pop that will alter your status of sheeple. Pills are for understanding, action is for freedom"
"when you consider that likely 100M-1B people have contracted Wuhan virus since October 2019, then we can see that this pandemic isn't deadly enough for the reaction we have taken. When we lacked information in February, the spread demanded a serious multilateral response. Great! - we did the right thing at the time and we can now see it was overkill. People are so frightened right now that when they have mild symptoms or are basically asymptomatic, they don't come forward for testing fearing oppressive living conditions beyond the current state of oppression if they were to test positive. Therefore, we might conjecture that there are probably 1 billion people that have been infected. It has killed under 50k when you consider the nerfing of pneumonia and flu death numbers in the last three months. The reaction is overkill and is currently maintained to protect large corporate entities from legal liability - they can't afford all the lawyers required to stop workers and customers from suing them for catching the bug while in the stores, but if they shut down and mom-and-pop shops stay open then later when order is restored, they have lost a considerable amount of business. FDR never putting teeth back into antitrust law resulted in a laissez-faire capitalism that has given rise to multinational conglomerate feudal states and these feudal states run the world and dictate to our politicians what should be the governing logic for policy making. The saddest part of all this, is that "power" players can't do anything without the masses either supporting the action or just letting it happen without resistance... meaning, we have done all of this to ourselves. Citizens have become pussy faggots, especially in the West - a place where the most powerful citizen revolutions occurred for centuries. The West is the new 3rd World - 3rd rate political mentality, 3rd rate political enfranchisement, 3rd rate political consciousness. Voat is one of the last refuges for those who still want to think dangerously ie. think about freedom. That makes goats the real refugees of this world. There is no 'pill' to pop that will alter your status of sheeple. Pills are for understanding, action is for freedom"
My Dog is Shivering and Shaking
https://www.wired.com/2016/11/block-ultrasonic-signals-didnt-know-tracking/
The next post was linking to a fairly dated article, but I felt it a relevant topic of discussion given that the quarantine has encouraged people to embrace new apps without checking their specs or considering their EULA. Zoom is a conference chat app that has become very popular lately, however it clearly emits a high-frequency signal because my dog reacts to the Zoom app being used the same way he reacts to smoke alarms and other high-pitch noises going off - he begins shaking and shivering. I don't trust Zoom, but I will continue to use it during the quarantine. After that, I will uninstall. Also, I have decided to start going to airplane mode on my phone and laptop much more often. It is now clear that companies collect a lot of private data and the public is being complacent about this invasion of privacy - it is an "out of sight, out of mind" situation for the public. Incidentally, that mentality was aptly described by Orwell when showing us the sheeple from the dystopic authoritarian world of Big Brother. If I were to dismiss a genius like George Orwell, I should consider myself quite foolish.
The next post was linking to a fairly dated article, but I felt it a relevant topic of discussion given that the quarantine has encouraged people to embrace new apps without checking their specs or considering their EULA. Zoom is a conference chat app that has become very popular lately, however it clearly emits a high-frequency signal because my dog reacts to the Zoom app being used the same way he reacts to smoke alarms and other high-pitch noises going off - he begins shaking and shivering. I don't trust Zoom, but I will continue to use it during the quarantine. After that, I will uninstall. Also, I have decided to start going to airplane mode on my phone and laptop much more often. It is now clear that companies collect a lot of private data and the public is being complacent about this invasion of privacy - it is an "out of sight, out of mind" situation for the public. Incidentally, that mentality was aptly described by Orwell when showing us the sheeple from the dystopic authoritarian world of Big Brother. If I were to dismiss a genius like George Orwell, I should consider myself quite foolish.
The Usual Scumbags
My final post for the second stint on free speech platforms, lined-up the array of wicked forces operating in contemporary society. I love scientific achievement, whether it be medical advancements or technological innovations, however, the greedy power-mongers who run Big Pharma and Big Tech try as hard as they can to maximize profit at the expense of human health and human lives. It is unconscionably evil and people such as, Bill Gates, will be judged by humanity centuries from now as having been negligent in allowing those industries to operate without ethical oversight. Also, I am a huge fan of entertainment media, but the reality is that the entertainment industry has become base in its modes of expression over the past two decades. The quality of products is quite low and the propaganda is thinly-veiled. Entertainment is breeding an idiocracy, especially through its embrace of postcolonial theory and feminism. My "Usual Scumbags" meme was presented at free speech platforms and one might have thought that it would be well-supported content.
Overall, the meme was well-supported by the far-right community (77 views, 42 upvotes, 4 downvotes, and 6 comments after 23 hours). Interestingly, most of the user comments were focused on pointing out that Jews are responsible for the hegemony of the fives domains I featured in my meme. I have a problem with blanketed antisemitism. Indeed, Judaism is a perniciously xenophobic religion and it certainly seduces all Jews to some extent. However, those seductions are thinly-veiled and many Jews reject the arrogant, xenophobic tenets of being "chosen" and in fact many Jews embrace being "antisemitic" to some degree. Therefore, antisemitism doesn't make sense to me. If you are evil - then you are evil - and it doesn't matter where you are from or the color of your skin. It should be noted that some cultures suffer from historical developments or religious ideologies that render their culture toward encouraging behaviour that is anti-human and anti-social. Judaism has been the bane of the Jewish people and it is responsible for their historical persecution, their personality vice and their genetic-based crutches (ie. Aspergers from inbreeding). It would be absurd to conflate Judaism with "jewish". You can be ethnically Jewish and still wholeheartedly reject the values of Judaism. If you did this, then I wouldn't be able to justify having disdain for you. In my books, you would be one of the good guys.
The far-right community at free speech platforms cannot be convinced that Judaism and jewish are different, and because they find jews anathema they never learn to understand the culture so that they can separate the religious-based conceits from the ethnic-based dispositions. I left free speech platforms after a short period of use a few years ago. The primary reason was the blanketed racism against Jews and blacks. I will be leaving again for much the same reasons, but this time the frightening schizophrenia of Qultists is another reason to get away from the far-right.
Overall, the meme was well-supported by the far-right community (77 views, 42 upvotes, 4 downvotes, and 6 comments after 23 hours). Interestingly, most of the user comments were focused on pointing out that Jews are responsible for the hegemony of the fives domains I featured in my meme. I have a problem with blanketed antisemitism. Indeed, Judaism is a perniciously xenophobic religion and it certainly seduces all Jews to some extent. However, those seductions are thinly-veiled and many Jews reject the arrogant, xenophobic tenets of being "chosen" and in fact many Jews embrace being "antisemitic" to some degree. Therefore, antisemitism doesn't make sense to me. If you are evil - then you are evil - and it doesn't matter where you are from or the color of your skin. It should be noted that some cultures suffer from historical developments or religious ideologies that render their culture toward encouraging behaviour that is anti-human and anti-social. Judaism has been the bane of the Jewish people and it is responsible for their historical persecution, their personality vice and their genetic-based crutches (ie. Aspergers from inbreeding). It would be absurd to conflate Judaism with "jewish". You can be ethnically Jewish and still wholeheartedly reject the values of Judaism. If you did this, then I wouldn't be able to justify having disdain for you. In my books, you would be one of the good guys.
The far-right community at free speech platforms cannot be convinced that Judaism and jewish are different, and because they find jews anathema they never learn to understand the culture so that they can separate the religious-based conceits from the ethnic-based dispositions. I left free speech platforms after a short period of use a few years ago. The primary reason was the blanketed racism against Jews and blacks. I will be leaving again for much the same reasons, but this time the frightening schizophrenia of Qultists is another reason to get away from the far-right.
art by Artem Demura
Comments...
On my second stint with free speech platforms, I dropped in a few dozen comments. Some comments were made to draw fire and others were to scare people off. Sometimes, I made comments simply to see how I would feel expressing ideas freely in an online community. It is a good opportunity to check your ethics. How did I feel complimenting an artwork by Hitler? Well, it was a good rendering. If we shouldn't recognize that fact, then perhaps we should also stop playing Michael Jackson on the radio. One of my more detailed and politically-charged comments was about organized religions:
"Christian Right are evangelical born-again christians. How about looking up information next time instead of wasting my fucking time
As I said, the Christian Right won't enjoy my content because it isn't wholesale against sex and sexuality as an open discourse.
Abrahamic faiths needed to control the NPC sheeple and realized that sex and sexuality are discourses that are inherently wild. Instead of attempting to regulate and control those discourses the early religious authorities simply licensed against such discourses and rendered them taboo through scripture. As a result, those religions promote sexual repression, leading to many problems including poor sex education (results in young women not becoming responsible about their sexuality leading to liberal attitudes toward abortion among other problems), pedophilia (child diddling among clergy), satanism (a cult based in being subaltern to Christianity due to being sexually abused by the church authority), Scientology (much like satanism, but instead of maintaining a victim mentality about being abused, they include fantasy schizo notions of having been perpetrators of sex abuse in the past). Ha, and that's just reviewing some of the perversions of Christianity, not to mention the horrors of Judaism and Islam.
Abrahamic faiths are the real devil and have done an excellent job of destroying the species (religions likely devised, organized and exported by misanthropic sociopathic narcissist homosexuals). Only the hard work and ingenuity and creativity of rational individualist genius has allowed the human race to continue (sadly, many of those geniuses have had to pretend they are religious to avoid persecution so they can actually get their work done).
I am a rational individualist who navigates the multi-dimensional discursive formations in a dynamic manner. I am not an empiricist (or materialist, if you wanted to be more limited). My faith is based on honest review and openness to change. My strongest beliefs change when new strong evidence presents itself. My faith is based on "high ideas".
Sounds like empiricists offend you... not surprised. Among the morons, the empiricists do have intellectual advantage over religious-based collectivists.
multi-dimensional thinkers are at the top I'm afraid. we see the sphere that those stuck in the 2D plane only see a circle when the form is most complete for them. well, at least you can revel in the fact that being a 3D thinker in a 2D world is a miserable fucking experience.
And I've come to realize that collectivists can't help it.. they simply don't have the intellectual capacity to create individualized belief systems. If they tried, then they would quickly notice that the tenets of their individualized faith don't add up or make sense. this would lead to cognitive dissociation and probably end in homicide and suicide, if not simply leading to a life of being zombified on antipsychotic sedatives. I don't blame the collectivists for their limitations, but if they could get to the multi-dimensional discourse then they would quickly realize they are fodder... there is no heaven waiting for collectivists. They will be on the shelf and used for entertainment when multi-dimensional thinking rational individualists get out of here. It will never be heaven for collectivists, but it might be hell."
I added some more points:
"Q stuff is embarrassingly moronic.
When the Church failed children through them getting abused by church authority they grew up and formed Satanism
Then when it kept happening, they grew up and formed Scientology
Now, it still happens and they've grown up and formed Q
The odd thing is that Q are very Christian, but also they're not at all. Christianity has Jesus Christ and it shouldn't need Mohammed style prophets such as Q. It is a religion where God directly interfaced with humanity, yet these Q guys are willing to empower a prophet with God's mission... almost seems sacrilegious and i'm not religious myself, but that's what it seems like. Somehow, the Church failed Q (probably through child abuse) and these guys aren't willing to give up on Christian God, but there is a significant void through their suspicion on the power of the church. Q is the new church."
I believe that free speech platforms are valuable places to learn about fear. You can overcome fear by participating in a community driven by fear. Additionally, I have modified my father's MO of "the more you do, the more you can do; the less you do, the less you can do" and added "the more you tolerate, the more you can tolerate; the less you tolerate, the less you can tolerate". I believe that it is strong characters and worthy personalities that address their fears directly and learn to tolerate the things in the world that disturb them and the things about themselves that disturb them. We should never be afraid of word - even hateful words - and as long as words do not proscribe direct harm to others, we should allow all speech and investigate it for what rational ideas it may hold.
"Christian Right are evangelical born-again christians. How about looking up information next time instead of wasting my fucking time
As I said, the Christian Right won't enjoy my content because it isn't wholesale against sex and sexuality as an open discourse.
Abrahamic faiths needed to control the NPC sheeple and realized that sex and sexuality are discourses that are inherently wild. Instead of attempting to regulate and control those discourses the early religious authorities simply licensed against such discourses and rendered them taboo through scripture. As a result, those religions promote sexual repression, leading to many problems including poor sex education (results in young women not becoming responsible about their sexuality leading to liberal attitudes toward abortion among other problems), pedophilia (child diddling among clergy), satanism (a cult based in being subaltern to Christianity due to being sexually abused by the church authority), Scientology (much like satanism, but instead of maintaining a victim mentality about being abused, they include fantasy schizo notions of having been perpetrators of sex abuse in the past). Ha, and that's just reviewing some of the perversions of Christianity, not to mention the horrors of Judaism and Islam.
Abrahamic faiths are the real devil and have done an excellent job of destroying the species (religions likely devised, organized and exported by misanthropic sociopathic narcissist homosexuals). Only the hard work and ingenuity and creativity of rational individualist genius has allowed the human race to continue (sadly, many of those geniuses have had to pretend they are religious to avoid persecution so they can actually get their work done).
I am a rational individualist who navigates the multi-dimensional discursive formations in a dynamic manner. I am not an empiricist (or materialist, if you wanted to be more limited). My faith is based on honest review and openness to change. My strongest beliefs change when new strong evidence presents itself. My faith is based on "high ideas".
Sounds like empiricists offend you... not surprised. Among the morons, the empiricists do have intellectual advantage over religious-based collectivists.
multi-dimensional thinkers are at the top I'm afraid. we see the sphere that those stuck in the 2D plane only see a circle when the form is most complete for them. well, at least you can revel in the fact that being a 3D thinker in a 2D world is a miserable fucking experience.
And I've come to realize that collectivists can't help it.. they simply don't have the intellectual capacity to create individualized belief systems. If they tried, then they would quickly notice that the tenets of their individualized faith don't add up or make sense. this would lead to cognitive dissociation and probably end in homicide and suicide, if not simply leading to a life of being zombified on antipsychotic sedatives. I don't blame the collectivists for their limitations, but if they could get to the multi-dimensional discourse then they would quickly realize they are fodder... there is no heaven waiting for collectivists. They will be on the shelf and used for entertainment when multi-dimensional thinking rational individualists get out of here. It will never be heaven for collectivists, but it might be hell."
I added some more points:
"Q stuff is embarrassingly moronic.
When the Church failed children through them getting abused by church authority they grew up and formed Satanism
Then when it kept happening, they grew up and formed Scientology
Now, it still happens and they've grown up and formed Q
The odd thing is that Q are very Christian, but also they're not at all. Christianity has Jesus Christ and it shouldn't need Mohammed style prophets such as Q. It is a religion where God directly interfaced with humanity, yet these Q guys are willing to empower a prophet with God's mission... almost seems sacrilegious and i'm not religious myself, but that's what it seems like. Somehow, the Church failed Q (probably through child abuse) and these guys aren't willing to give up on Christian God, but there is a significant void through their suspicion on the power of the church. Q is the new church."
I believe that free speech platforms are valuable places to learn about fear. You can overcome fear by participating in a community driven by fear. Additionally, I have modified my father's MO of "the more you do, the more you can do; the less you do, the less you can do" and added "the more you tolerate, the more you can tolerate; the less you tolerate, the less you can tolerate". I believe that it is strong characters and worthy personalities that address their fears directly and learn to tolerate the things in the world that disturb them and the things about themselves that disturb them. We should never be afraid of word - even hateful words - and as long as words do not proscribe direct harm to others, we should allow all speech and investigate it for what rational ideas it may hold.
art by Andrew Palyanov
Luddix
"Luddix" stands for Luddite Matrix - a place to discuss the neo-luddite revolution. It is essential that we turn away from the current Idiocracy based in collectivist ideologies. It is time to embrace our potential of becoming a species composed of rational individualists.
Luddix is the Luddite Matrix. We are a matrix (a place for rational individualists to situate themselves from time to time) and the luddite philosophy does not imply being anti-technology, but rather finding ways to manage digital culture, virtual spaces, and high technology into our lives in a more balanced way.
For example, Luddix members should aspire to reduce their virtual footprint while not intending to stand still as technology develops around us. One possible way to do this is to pick one day a week where you will not use social media, and instead will rely on analog-based culture such as reading books, painting a canvass, practicing a musical instrument, or going outside to play a sport.
Luddix is also a place to discuss philosophical issues from a rational individualist perspective. Not all ideas work at first, but what is most important is to be able to share those ideas so that other individualists can provide useful feedback such that the ideas might be modified and refined to become more rational. Rational individualism is based in each person developing a belief system that still works when encountering everyone else's belief system. Collectivist-based belief systems are a cop-out. We must learn to think for ourselves and train this ability so that it becomes the strongest part of ourselves.
I can believe 'x' and someone else can believe 'y', but my 'x' should never require that 'y' be untrue. The same can be said for 'y'. That is the starting point for Luddix
Luddix is the Luddite Matrix. We are a matrix (a place for rational individualists to situate themselves from time to time) and the luddite philosophy does not imply being anti-technology, but rather finding ways to manage digital culture, virtual spaces, and high technology into our lives in a more balanced way.
For example, Luddix members should aspire to reduce their virtual footprint while not intending to stand still as technology develops around us. One possible way to do this is to pick one day a week where you will not use social media, and instead will rely on analog-based culture such as reading books, painting a canvass, practicing a musical instrument, or going outside to play a sport.
Luddix is also a place to discuss philosophical issues from a rational individualist perspective. Not all ideas work at first, but what is most important is to be able to share those ideas so that other individualists can provide useful feedback such that the ideas might be modified and refined to become more rational. Rational individualism is based in each person developing a belief system that still works when encountering everyone else's belief system. Collectivist-based belief systems are a cop-out. We must learn to think for ourselves and train this ability so that it becomes the strongest part of ourselves.
I can believe 'x' and someone else can believe 'y', but my 'x' should never require that 'y' be untrue. The same can be said for 'y'. That is the starting point for Luddix
art by Ausonia 23
Luddix - Discussing the Human Psyche
Consider that the human mind is partitioned (split) by nature.
One part is the CONSCIOUS mind
And the other part is the UNCONSCIOUS mind
The conscious mind is where we experience self-awareness, but we are not necessarily introspective by virtue of being sentient. That is to say, there are different levels of self-awareness
The conscious mind experiences through lower faculties and higher faculties
The lower faculties are feeling (or affect): emotion and aggression
The higher faculties are thinking: introspection and ethics
The unconscious mind experiences without lower faculties (it does not feel)
The conscious mind prioritizes within the set of experiential data because of feeling (that is to say, some experiences, ideas, concepts, etc. are considered more important than others)
The unconscious mind does not prioritize within the set of experiential data (it is like a computer version of our personality - it is a version of the personality we recognize ourselves to be, except it has no feeling)
Due to these important differences for the two components of our mind, the unconscious mind develops different priorities from the conscious mind and this leads to a kind of internal struggle.
The conscious mind is interested in feelings such as pleasure, whereas the unconscious mind is interested in novel experience (and avoiding redundant experience)
Once a human has become mature enough they will develop an awareness consciously that their unconscious exists and exerts a force on their lives and contributes to the formation of their overall personality. Many come to believe that the unconscious mind is an obstacle (or even nuisance). This is natural. As such, people will create a pseudo-partition of their conscious mind.
The pseudo-partition creates the SUBCONSCIOUS
One part is the CONSCIOUS mind
And the other part is the UNCONSCIOUS mind
The conscious mind is where we experience self-awareness, but we are not necessarily introspective by virtue of being sentient. That is to say, there are different levels of self-awareness
The conscious mind experiences through lower faculties and higher faculties
The lower faculties are feeling (or affect): emotion and aggression
The higher faculties are thinking: introspection and ethics
The unconscious mind experiences without lower faculties (it does not feel)
The conscious mind prioritizes within the set of experiential data because of feeling (that is to say, some experiences, ideas, concepts, etc. are considered more important than others)
The unconscious mind does not prioritize within the set of experiential data (it is like a computer version of our personality - it is a version of the personality we recognize ourselves to be, except it has no feeling)
Due to these important differences for the two components of our mind, the unconscious mind develops different priorities from the conscious mind and this leads to a kind of internal struggle.
The conscious mind is interested in feelings such as pleasure, whereas the unconscious mind is interested in novel experience (and avoiding redundant experience)
Once a human has become mature enough they will develop an awareness consciously that their unconscious exists and exerts a force on their lives and contributes to the formation of their overall personality. Many come to believe that the unconscious mind is an obstacle (or even nuisance). This is natural. As such, people will create a pseudo-partition of their conscious mind.
The pseudo-partition creates the SUBCONSCIOUS
art by Frank Frazetta
Luddix - On Visual Art Production
The visual artist has become less talented with the advent of digital painting technologies.
The digital medium allows the artist to try out brushstrokes, perhaps by the dozens, until the artist settles on one of the brushstrokes that they feel is "best"
The traditional medium requires that the artist hone their skills and perfect their style, so that they get the best brushstroke the first time. To some degree traditional paints allow for errors, but over time the traditional medium will encourage the development of expertise.
Learning after reaching the level of expertise is infinitely more valuable than the learning that comes from being able to get away with unlimited errors.
Additionally, traditional paintings look much more lifelike than digital paintings, not only because of the natural material base, but because the commitment to brushstrokes is an organic process, as opposed to a process of mass reproducibility.
The digital medium allows the artist to try out brushstrokes, perhaps by the dozens, until the artist settles on one of the brushstrokes that they feel is "best"
The traditional medium requires that the artist hone their skills and perfect their style, so that they get the best brushstroke the first time. To some degree traditional paints allow for errors, but over time the traditional medium will encourage the development of expertise.
Learning after reaching the level of expertise is infinitely more valuable than the learning that comes from being able to get away with unlimited errors.
Additionally, traditional paintings look much more lifelike than digital paintings, not only because of the natural material base, but because the commitment to brushstrokes is an organic process, as opposed to a process of mass reproducibility.
art by Laurel D. Austin
Luddix - Will vs Whimsy
We are said to possess the capacity of willpower - Man has a will (woman as well)
There is Will and willpower
There is also Whimsy and whim-wham
Individualists exert a Will
Collectivists exert a Whimsy
Whimsy is fanciful reduplication - a facade of Will; whim-wham is a facade of willpower
The Whimsy of each individual in a collective is powerless, and the only power arising from Whimsy is when it is expressed collectively
In the end, it will be discovered that Whimsy never had authority and it required willpower in order to exert force and effect. What this means is that the oppression individualists face when experiencing a context composed of collectivists is in fact an ideal situation for individualists. Individualism is driven by willpower distinguishing itself from whim-wham. The individual learns to exert more willpower through being exposed to the hardships of collectivist whim-wham.
Conversely, the Will exerts a force. Whimsy fancifully reduplicates that force in order to have an effect. Whim-wham is an effect of willpower. Without individualists, collectivists could achieve nothing, much like the behaviour of drones in the colonies of certain insects once the individual (typically a queen) has died. When the queen ant dies, no new ants are produced and the colony dies. Similarly, when individualists do not exert willpower then the collective has nothing to reduplicate fancifully and it will not exert whim-wham.
A human society without individualists will cease to exert force and will perish
There is Will and willpower
There is also Whimsy and whim-wham
Individualists exert a Will
Collectivists exert a Whimsy
Whimsy is fanciful reduplication - a facade of Will; whim-wham is a facade of willpower
The Whimsy of each individual in a collective is powerless, and the only power arising from Whimsy is when it is expressed collectively
In the end, it will be discovered that Whimsy never had authority and it required willpower in order to exert force and effect. What this means is that the oppression individualists face when experiencing a context composed of collectivists is in fact an ideal situation for individualists. Individualism is driven by willpower distinguishing itself from whim-wham. The individual learns to exert more willpower through being exposed to the hardships of collectivist whim-wham.
Conversely, the Will exerts a force. Whimsy fancifully reduplicates that force in order to have an effect. Whim-wham is an effect of willpower. Without individualists, collectivists could achieve nothing, much like the behaviour of drones in the colonies of certain insects once the individual (typically a queen) has died. When the queen ant dies, no new ants are produced and the colony dies. Similarly, when individualists do not exert willpower then the collective has nothing to reduplicate fancifully and it will not exert whim-wham.
A human society without individualists will cease to exert force and will perish
art by Ahmed Maihope
Message to Talented Creators
As a talented creator, it is likely that your intention is to find public support for your work - you want to make a difference and you want to improve life for people. You can try to find public support for your work through bottom-up approaches or top-down approaches. Top-down requires that you convince hard-working professionals that your work deserves an opportunity to be rated by the public. Bottom-up requires that you convince obsessive amateurs that your work deserves an opportunity to be rated by the public. The public will not look at your work until cultural intermediaries (from the top or bottom) package the work appropriately for mass distribution.
If your work is reflective of hard-working professionalism then it will likely seem alienating to the bottom-up cultural intermediaries (social media moderators, and the like). They will censor you, shadowban you, and do whatever they can to make sure that not only does the public never get the chance to judge your work, but that top-down agencies can’t see your work from that grassroots bottom-up distribution channel. A lot of this censorship is driven by professional jealousy - the bottom-up cultural intermediaries (social media mods) wanted to make it big in an industry, but they lacked the talent. They arranged themselves as bottom-up intermediaries with the expressed purpose of censoring talent - talent that can actually achieve at a level the intermediary could never reach.
My recommendation to talented creators is to not focus on social media as a means to reach a fan base, but instead work hard to reach out to professionals who can then package your work in ways that they have discovered are effective for eliciting mass appeal.
If your work is reflective of hard-working professionalism then it will likely seem alienating to the bottom-up cultural intermediaries (social media moderators, and the like). They will censor you, shadowban you, and do whatever they can to make sure that not only does the public never get the chance to judge your work, but that top-down agencies can’t see your work from that grassroots bottom-up distribution channel. A lot of this censorship is driven by professional jealousy - the bottom-up cultural intermediaries (social media mods) wanted to make it big in an industry, but they lacked the talent. They arranged themselves as bottom-up intermediaries with the expressed purpose of censoring talent - talent that can actually achieve at a level the intermediary could never reach.
My recommendation to talented creators is to not focus on social media as a means to reach a fan base, but instead work hard to reach out to professionals who can then package your work in ways that they have discovered are effective for eliciting mass appeal.
Back to the Wizard Peanut...
